Captain and Motley Crew Model failing Northumberland County Council?

 

With Northumberland Conservatives choosing a new direction of t
ravel for decision making by having an ‘all powerful decision making Leader and Cabinet’ people are concerned that the public are being completely left out of the ability to harvest information and agree or disagree with their Council’s adopted policies that apply both now and into the future.

Its very well known that the past Conservative Council’s since 2017 have kept decision making very secretive but the process of ‘Scrutiny’ by opposition Councillors and an active regional press has managed to expose many of the Council’s dodgy decisions that only comfort Conservative held rural areas and towns creating and disadvantaging the more urban and heavily problematic through poverty and historical deprivation zones leading to economic rundown and high levels of dependency on Housing Benefit and other Welfare assistance.

Its believed that the Leader and his Cabinet are making a series of policy decisions which have yet to see the light of day and Labour’s opposition leader Cllr. Scott Dickinson is concerned that no scheduled meetings to scrutinise the ‘new’ forward plan have been called since the election on May 1st and that the Conservative Cabinet may have top-sliced finance even further away from areas of need as paying the debt on their borrowing since 2017 is now beginning to catch up with them.

Reform UK the largest opposition group on Northumberland County Council  appear to be satisfied with trying to condemn organisations who celebrate unity, such as the RNLI, anything to do with fairness, including women's equality along with  running down the NHS improvements coming forward to assist poorer areas. The role of being a Councillor does not come naturally to most elected Reformers who up to now only wish to hoist a Trumpian DOGE onto the Council.

Extremism Its circles have a common theme.

Jumping around on the denial freight train whilst whipping up the common man is a well practiced art of extremists and political ‘bollockticians’ hungry for power.

Leon Trotsky and world-wide spinning of anti-state communism led to the Russian working people's acceptance that they are poor through slavery to the wealthy leading to the enlightenment of self emancipation is being used again and again by local bollockticians to whip up fear and as a methodology towards gaining power or causing great angst among Governments everywhere. 

In Russia the fear of being seen as anti-state is now used to bolster control by the new wealthy, things never really change?

The circles used by both right and left extremists are for slightly different purposes but they are still used effectively and the bollickticians slip from right to left at will to get the messages of the nouveau-riche carried directly to the people. Take BREXIT as a fine example of their art. It was and still is bollocks yet has caused great angst for two different Governments.

Let's take a quick look at two locals carrying the messages yet being used by others to re-enslave those who have been trapped in limbo for decades.

John Falkenstein and Natalie Rolls, John was a writer and reporter with extreme leftist views and sympathy’s whipping up workers and the youth following with his work published in the Ultra Left Militant newspaper. He’s now a living chattel of REFORM UK and its posh boy leaders who wish to control and enslave the lower classes.

Natalie Rolls on the other hand has shown a stronger hand when rising through the ranks of the ultra left by whipping up hatred through open questioning of the Tory led Northumberland County Council engendering herself on the altar of a reforming mammon seemingly pleasing her party suitors immensely pushing hatred to an unsubstantiated level.

Natalie published the following:

Statement Regarding Northumberland County Council’s Plans for Migrant Resettlement:

We, the residents of Northumberland, are deeply concerned about the council’s decision to cram 20,000 migrants into our communities without any meaningful consultation. These plans are being pushed through as though the voices of the people who actually live here don’t matter.

While we are not opposed to providing help to those in need, the reality is that our schools are already full to bursting, the NHS is stretched beyond its capacity, and housing is in a dire state. Adding thousands more people into this strained infrastructure will only exacerbate the situation, leading to further difficulties for the existing population.

Additionally, we are troubled by the financial impact of these plans. Our elderly, who have worked hard all their lives, are seeing their winter fuel allowance scrapped, while resources are being diverted to house and support migrants in 5-star accommodations. The stark contrast between £1.3 billion needed for fuel payments and the billions being spent on migration services is deeply unjust and feels like a slap in the face to the local people who have contributed to this country for generations.

This is not just about finances—it’s about preserving the culture and way of life that makes Northumberland special. Our communities thrive on unity, where neighbours look out for one another. The arrival of large numbers of people who may not integrate into these close-knit communities raises concerns about the future cohesion and identity of our region.

We urge the council to provide greater transparency and to respect the voices of its residents by engaging in proper consultation. The people of Northumberland deserve to have a say in decisions that will impact our communities for years to come.

Enough is enough. We call on the council to address these concerns and reconsider its current course of action.

She followed it up with a letter to the Council publishing it on her social media.

19th September 2024

Northumberland County Council�County Hall�Morpeth�Northumberland�NE61 2EF

Dear whom ever it concerns,

Re: Concerns Regarding Plans to House Migrants in Northumberland

I am writing to express my deep concerns about the council’s plans to house 20,000 migrants in our county. While I understand the importance of doing our part as a community, there are serious issues that need addressing—issues that many residents, myself included, feel are being overlooked.

Firstly, it is disappointing that there has been little to no public consultation on this matter. Decisions that impact our communities, culture, and way of life are being made without proper input from the people who live here. This lack of transparency is concerning, and it feels as though the council is pushing these plans through without considering the valid concerns of residents. We deserve a seat at the table and a real say in how our county moves forward.

Beyond the lack of consultation, there is the question of cost. Many of us see the immense financial strain that migration, both legal and illegal, is placing on the country as a whole. Billions are being spent on housing, benefits, and services for new arrivals, while our own people—especially the elderly—are struggling. The fact that the winter fuel allowance has been cut for many of our pensioners, forcing them to choose between heating and eating, while migrants are placed in high-quality accommodations, feels like an injustice. The comparison is stark: £1.3 billion to provide winter fuel payments once a year, versus multiple billions spent on managing migration. This is a real kick in the teeth for hardworking, long-standing members of our community who now feel left behind.

We are also deeply concerned about the strain this will place on our public services—our schools, healthcare, and housing. Northumberland is proud of its strong, close-knit communities, and we value our unique culture, heritage, and dialect. While we are open to change, it must be change that strengthens rather than undermines the fabric of our communities. Rapid and unmanaged migration could lead to cultural fragmentation, and we are not willing to see that happen here.

This brings me to some critical questions. First, what is the mechanism by which the council will determine the backgrounds of those being resettled here? How can we be assured that proper vetting and safety checks are in place? As residents, we are deeply concerned about the lack of transparency regarding who these people are and whether or not they will be integrating into our communities in a way that maintains cohesion and safety for everyone involved.

Moreover, I must ask what the council believes the outcome of this social experiment will be? It seems that these plans involve placing a large number of people—potentially from very different cultural backgrounds—into areas where they may not have the necessary support to integrate successfully. Has the council considered the long-term social and economic impacts of this decision on the fabric of our communities?

In addition to the costs of migration, we see huge amounts of taxpayer money being spent on initiatives like Net Zero, diversity, and inclusion projects—while our own people are suffering from a cost-of-living crisis. It feels like the priorities are misplaced, and we urge the council to consider the real impact this is having on the lives of local residents.

We are asking for reassurance from the council that these plans will be reconsidered, and that local concerns will be taken seriously. We need transparency, proper consultation, and a balanced approach that prioritises the needs of the people already living here, many of whom are struggling in these difficult times.

We all want to live in a community that is fair, inclusive, and sustainable. But that requires careful planning and genuine input from the people who call this county home. Please take our concerns seriously, and ensure that any decisions made about the future of Northumberland reflect the interests of its residents first.

I look forward to your response and hope to see more open dialogue moving forward.

Yours sincerely,

Natalie Rolls

Reform UK

lets wait and see what response we get from the council

She then sent a freedom of information request to the Council seeking even more personal information.

Dear Northumberland County Council,
I am submitting a request under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 for information concerning the involvement of councillors, board members, and other relevant officials in both the Migrant Dispersal Scheme and Mears Group or any of its subsidiaries. My request seeks to understand whether any financial, personal, or professional interests exist that may affect the integrity of decision-making or procurement processes. Specifically, I would like to request the following information:
1. Declaration of Interests:Provide details of any declared financial, personal, or prejudicial interests of councillors, board members, and officials in relation to the Migrant Dispersal Scheme, Mears Group, or its subsidiaries (both past and present).
Information on any family members or close associates of the above officials who may have a financial stake in Mears Group or its subsidiaries.
2. Meeting Minutes and Records:Supply meeting minutes from relevant committees or council sessions, particularly the Cabinet, that discuss the Migrant Dispersal Scheme or any contracts awarded to Mears Group or its subsidiaries.
Include any discussions on potential conflicts of interest or any declarations of interest made during these meetings.
3. Procurement Process:Provide documents detailing the procurement and tendering process used in awarding contracts to Mears Group in connection with the Migrant Dispersal Scheme, especially any protocols for avoiding conflicts of interest or ensuring fair competition.
Copies of internal reviews, audits, or reports on how the contracts with Mears Group were awarded, including any clauses requiring adherence to Fair Tax principles or ethical standards.
4. Gifts, Donations, and Financial Incentives:Records of any gifts, donations, benefits, or financial incentives received by councillors, board members, or officials from Mears Group, its subsidiaries, or any associated entities in relation to their roles.
Information on any investigations, complaints, or disciplinary actions that have been raised concerning potential undeclared interests or conflicts involving officials with ties to Mears Group or the Migrant Dispersal Scheme.
5. Contractual Agreements with Mears Group:A list of all contracts awarded to Mears Group or any of its subsidiaries in relation to the Migrant Dispersal Scheme, including details of any key decision-makers or councillors who were involved in the selection or approval process.
Any correspondence that indicates financial links or influence between councillors, officials, or their associates and Mears Group.
6. Financial and Employment Connections:Information on any employment ties between current or past councillors, board members, or officials (or their family members) with Mears Group, its subsidiaries, or related entities.
Records of any shares, investments, or financial interests held by councillors, board members, or officials in Mears Group or its subsidiaries.
7. Compliance with Transparency Standards:Provide any documentation or reports that show how the council ensured compliance with the Fair Tax Declaration and other transparency or anti-corruption measures when awarding contracts to Mears Group.
Any monitoring reports or assessments showing whether the contracts with Mears Group and its subsidiaries have adhered to ethical, financial, and environmental standards.

Public Interest Argument:
This request is made in the public interest, particularly to ensure transparency and accountability in the involvement of councillors, board members, and officials in the management of public resources and contracts related to the Migrant Dispersal Scheme. Given the council’s commitment to transparency under the Fair Tax Declaration, it is essential to verify whether there are any conflicts of interest or ethical concerns that may affect public confidence in these decisions

I look forward to your response within the statutory timeframe of 20 working days as outlined in the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
Thank you for your assistance.
Yours sincerely,

Natalie Rolls

The response to her questions are attached to this link /https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/freedom_of_information_request_i_308/response/2810461/attach/2/Response%20some%20exempt.pdf?cookie_passthrough=1 showing her allegations of 20,000 migrants being housed in Northumberland were false, but the damage was done.

A look at the obvious was never knocked back by Northumberland Conservatives, the obvious question is where would 20,000 homes be purchased by the said Mears Group. The Conservative Leader of Council FAILED to knock back this massive social media spin into the public domain allowing racism to rule the social media airwaves.

The populations of Northumberland's largest Towns are as follows:

Where would 20,000 migrants live?

NOTES
https://www.marxists.org/history/etol/newspape///militant/1984/696%20Militant%2020%2004%201984.pdf

Tories outmaneuver Reform Northumberland now ruled by a Dic-Tattie?

 

In a land where street weeds as tall as children wave in the breeze in a similar fashion to  Attenborough's undersea pictures of seagrass and kelp forests, where seagull strewn empty Greggs bags and Mcdonalds waste pitched from dark windowed vehicles blow around forming carpets weeks after being dumped ending in areas where autumn leaves once congregated to die and rot is not the picture Northumberland tourism want to show but unfortunately all too common in ‘forgotten’ South East Northumberland now politically run by Reform UK Ltd.

Reform UK Ltd. who now hold the majority of seats across the South East of the County on Northumberland County Council where the majority of people live. Reform Councillors have failed their supporters by falling at  the first hurdle. 

Instead of turning out to represent their voters, they have made conscious decisions to sit on their phones and pads in the warmth of their living rooms pumping out anti Labour and Tory nonsense while Northumberland’s shrewd Conservatives ignore its new largest opposition party raining drastic change onto an unsuspecting public as Reform UK Ltd’s democratically elected membership lay back on their sofas in ignorant bliss.

The social media littering sewage they continually pump out includes the wish to hoist a Trumpian DOGE onto Northumberland County Council to try to back up their allegations of corruption at all levels whilst cutting off the Council’s workforce from their pensions and futures.

Their DOGE wishes have fallen at the first hurdle as to change the audit policy of the County Council they needed to change the Conservatives hardened in ‘Constitution of the Council’.

Dutifully, the Council held its meeting of the Constitution working group as it must do when new councils are formed. Reform UK Councillors who have three members of the panel being the largest opposition group didn’t bother to turn up to the meeting, we're led to believe they didn’t even submit a letter to offer constitutional changes to suit their case. Their ignorance allowed the Northumberland Conservative to push on with their wishes to step up the powers of their Council Leader, adopting a Leader with Cabinet model; effectively the Leader has totalitarian power over the Council and all decisions have to be cleared by him.

The him in our report is of course farming Councillor Glenn Sanderson whose first decision was to ensure his Cabinet felt weakened and must kowtow at his feet, ran out an article in the regional press naming his financial guru Councillor Nick Oliver as being responsible for the overspends in social services dragging down his image and killing off any ambition he may have had to topple his leader over the next four years.

Dictator, Despot or as we ask Dic-Tattie? 

Time will tell but with Reform UK already washed up onto a litter strewn beach and hiding behind the street weeds they need to manage as local councillors we believe this first hurdle fall will render them useless and they will stick to their sofas producing swill until 2029.

Notes:

https://northumberland.moderngov.co.uk/documents/s25740/Constitutional%20Review.pdf

https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-east-news/northumberland-county-council-budgets-hit-31837269